Russo-Ukrainian War: The Gerbera Drone

Source: Reddit

     The purpose of a decoy, first and foremost, is to deceive. The more life-like the decoy is and assuming proper deployment and employment, it has the chance to trick the enemy into believing something that is not true. Interestingly, in military parlance, a “dummy” refers to a decoy that mimics a piece of weaponry or equipment that is in use on the battlefield. Nevertheless, the term decoy is used broadly regardless if the decoy in question is a dummy or not. The Ukrainian Army makes heavy use of decoys, notably of 155mm M777 howitzers, NASAMS surface-to-air missile systems, M142 HIMARS vehicles, and other high value military weapons. This is to preserve, as long as possible, the equipment they have from losses.

     The Russian Federation forces also make use of decoys though not to the extent the Ukrainians do. In fact, many of the photographed front line decoys put together by Russian units are not too convincing. However, the Russians are using far more realistic decoys of S-300 (NATO reporting name SA-10 Grumble) and S-400 (SA-21 Growler) long-range surface-to-air missile systems. For example, the Russian company BalticAir offers an inflatable S-400 for $22,235...a steal in comparison to the cost of the genuine article. These decoys are being deployed in the Far East to replace actual S-300 or S-400 units which have been diverted to Ukraine and they are also seen in Crimea. However, in some instances, these decoys are easily spotted as they are placed without the accompanying vehicles associated with these missile batteries, to include separate radar, tow, and/or command post vehicles.

     Unfortunately, there is one Russian decoy that is quite difficult to differentiate from the real thing and that is shown here in the form of a downed Gerbera drone. The Gerbera (sometimes known as the Gerber) mimics the general shape of the Iranian HESA Shahed 136 loitering munition which Russia has purchased from Iran as well as the Russian license-built version, the Geran-2. Both the Shahed 136 and the Geran-2 make up the majority of the weapons deployed in Russian drone strikes against Ukrainian infrastructure as well as civilian targets. The Gerbera is reported to have first appeared in service starting in late July 2024.

     When Russia launches an air attack against Ukrainian targets, mixed into the Geran-2 and Shahed 136 munitions are Gerbera drones. Their purpose is to draw Ukrainian anti-air fire to them which allows the lethal munitions to get through to the target. Generally, the Gerbera does not carry a payload but a Ukrainian defender does not have the time to determine if the Gerbera is or is not a Geran-2 of Shahed 136 as they look much the same. This results in Ukrainian anti-air units having to expend ammunition (to include surface-to-air missiles [SAMs]) on the decoys when they could have been used against actual targets. While heavy machine-gun ammunition and light cannon ammunition is more readily available for resupply, the Ukrainian military does not have very large stocks of replacement SAMs for potent systems such as the MIM-104 Patriot, IRIS-T, MIM-23 Hawk, and NASAMS. This is one reason the Ukrainian military is using older SAMs to make up for expenditures. This includes the S-200 (SA-5 Gammon) and the even older S-125 (SA-3 Goa). In fact, Ukraine had retired the S-200 in 2013 but has since taken them out of mothballs starting in the summer of 2023.

     The Gerbera is primarily built from plywood with foam plastics to make them very inexpensive to produce, light, and also radio-frequency transparent (meaning, radio waves can pass through the drone with little to no interference). Power usually comes from a Chinese DLE60 2-stroke, 60cc ICE (Internal Combustion Engine) made by Mile Hao Xiang Technology. Some Gerbera have also been shown to use a slightly more powerful Stinger 70cc ICE made by the Chinese company RCGF Stinger Company, Ltd. Either rear mounted engine drives a wooden, 2-bladed propeller. Overall, the Gerbera is 6.6 feet long with a wingspan of 8.2 feet. This is a bit smaller than the Geran-2 which is 11 feet long but the Geran-2 shares the same wingspan as the Gerbera.

     A rather disturbing fact about the Gerbera is the number of components that are not Russian. Besides the Chinese engines, the electronics are from around the world...even from the United States. The XK-F358 mesh network (a broad band communication system for drone control) inside downed Gerbera drones has been proven to show hardware obtained from U.S. companies Analog Devices, Micron Technology, Xilinx Inc., Altera Corp., and even Texas Instruments. Other countries include Germany (Infineon Technologies), Ampleon (Netherlands), Realtek (Taiwan), and UIY, Inc. (China). Controlled radial pattern antennas and their related hardware (CPRA; used to protect GPS systems from interference/jamming) have been sourced from Analog Devices (United States), NXP Semiconductors (Netherlands), Integrated Silicon Solutions (United States), Monolithic Power Systems (United States), Linear Technology Corp. (United States), and again from Texas Instruments. So far, the 3-axis gimbal mounted camera used by the Gerbera comes from the Chinese company Topotek. Universal flight controllers and the hardware that goes with them is mainly Texas Instruments products. Other parts for the flight controllers has been obtained from XLSEMI (China), ATMEL Corp. (United States), U-Blox (Switzerland), STMicroelectronics (Switzerland), and NXP Semiconductors (Netherlands). Some downed Gerbera drones were found to be using Ukrainian SIM cards which permitted the drones to use Ukrainian high-speed connections for control guidance.

     Besides being a decoy, the Gerbera has also been shown to come in two other variants. The first is a loitering munition (much like the Geran-2 it mimics). At this task, it is not as successful as the Geran-2. It is believed the explosive payload is only 22 pounds compared to 198 pounds of the Geran-2. The normal decoy Gerbera has a range of around 186 miles but the loitering munition variant is thought to have a shorter range due to the added weight. Also, the camera used by the Gerbera is of a low quality, broadcasting using TV channels. It means the drone operator must manually fly the Gerbera into the target, much like a FPV drone, but without the superior maneuverability of a FPV drone. The second variant is used for reconnaissance, either using video cameras or gathering electronic data.

     As a note, the slogan scrawled on the left wing translates to “There will be no truce!”

Russo-Ukrainian War: The Latek Safari HG-105M Shotgun

Source: Ministry of Defense of Ukraine

     The prevalence of FPV (First Person View) drones on the battlefields of the Russo-Ukrainian War has been seeing the continued expansion of the shotgun as a means to combat them. At first, civilian shotguns were appearing in the hands of both Ukrainian and Russian troops, such as vintage TOZ-34 and TOZ-66 shotguns (neither of which are pump-action). The Ukrainian military has been purchasing more modern shotguns, notably those produced by Turkish arms manufacturers. One such example is shown here in the hands of a soldier of the 36th. Marine Brigade “Mykhailo Bilynsky”. The weapon is the Safari HG-105M semi-automatic 12-gauge shotgun, built by the Ukrainian non-state arms manufacturer Latek LLC. This is a license-built variant of the HG-105 which is designed and produced by the Turkish company Hima Arms.

     Why are shotguns the preferred means to combat FPV drones? The reason is pretty basic. Shotguns throw a lot of metal pellets into the air which greatly increases the chances of striking a flying drone and potentially damaging it. The very common #00 (sometimes called “double ought”) buckshot shell contains 8 or 9 pellets, each .330 inches in diameter. #1 buckshot holds 12 to 16 pellets while #4 buckshot has 21 to 28 pellets though this comes at the expense of diameter size. Another advantage of buckshot is the spread of the pellets as they travel through the air. Thus, rather than relying on sheer luck to down a moving FPV drone with a pistol or rifle bullet, a single shotgun shell can hurl several projectiles into the air at one time with a single pull of the trigger. As such, the odds of a strike are increased. A skilled user will have conducted patterning with his weapon. This involves firing the shotgun at a target from different ranges to see how many pellets hit. Often, the further away the target is, the fewer pellets will hit. As such, by patterning, the firer will be able to tell the optimum engagement range in which the majority of pellets will hit.

     Specifics of the Safari HG-105M are not given (even on Latek's website) and so what follows are the specifications for the Hima Arms HG-105D to which the Safari HG-105M is most likely similar to. The receiver and a portion of the weapon's internals uses 6082 aluminum alloy while the furniture is polymer. The barrel, bolt, bolt carrier, and the lock is made of 4140 steel. Overall length of the HG-105D is 28.5 inches with a empty weight of 8.6 pounds. The HG-105D has interchangeable chokes (full, modified, and cylinder), allowing the user to optimize accuracy and range by constricting the barrel to maintain a tighter pellet pattern at longer ranges (full choke) or, if desired, the opposite...a wider spread at closer ranges (cylinder choke). A modified choke falls in between full and cylinder. The HG-105D can use either a 5-round or 10-round polymer magazine. There is a photograph of a Safari HG-105M in Ukrainian service with an extended “banana” magazine that looks to hold at least 15 rounds. There is a picatinny rail on top of the weapon for optics and it comes standard with flip-up sights. Being semi-automatic, it fires as fast as the operator can pull the trigger. Other features include a reversible charging handle and a height-adjustable cheek rest.

     At a full choke, the typical effective range for a shotgun is 150 feet or 45 meters. This is often good enough to engage a FPV drone that requires contact with the target in order to detonate. Likewise, it can be effective to tackle smaller drones which are used for bomb drops or reconnaissance. Of course, regardless, it requires the shotgun wielder to actually spot the drone in order to engage it as some drones are quite quiet until they are almost on top of the target.

Russo-Ukrainian War: The Antonov An-196 Liutyi

Source: 14th. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Regiment

     The An-196 Liutyi ("Fierce"), shown here being prepped for a mission by personnel of the 14th. UAV Regiment, is produced by State Enterprise Antonov (a part of Ukroboronprom) and has been dubbed the “Ukrainian Shahed” (referencing the Iranian HESA Shahed 136 drones the Russians use) in media sources. The An-196 was developed in October 2022 and revealed a month later. 

     It is a pusher-design with the air-cooled, 4-valve engine in the rear, driving a 3-bladed propeller. The explosive payload of the An-196 is between 110 to 165 pounds which is wrapped in a fragmentation sleeve and the drone has a range in excess of 621 miles. The longest visually confirmed range achieved by an An-196 is 497 miles when one was downed by Russian anti-air defenses in the Ulyanovsk Oblast during an attack on the Syzran refinery in late April 2024. It is said the An-196 can attain a maximum range of 1,242 miles or more but this remains unverified. Such a range, if confirmed, may come at the expense of explosive payload capacity. 

     The drone uses a nose mounted impact fuze to detonate the warhead and guidance is a combination of satellite navigation and a onboard inertial navigation system. In addition, the An-196 uses a sophisticated flight computer system that allows it to autonomously change flight direction as needed as it flies towards the target. This is accomplished by pre-loading both navigation data and terrain data for the path into the computer. The drone can then compare what it “sees” externally and if they do not match, it can maneuver accordingly. For example, if a cellphone tower is not in the drone's data but the drone detects it in it's flight path, it will avoid it then return to its original trajectory. As such, it means that a drone operator isn't required to control the drone through its entire flight.

Russo-Ukrainian War: The BMP-2M "Berezhok"

Source: saintjavelin on Instagam

     What is likely the most bizarre ersatz anti-drone defense yet created is shown here, adorning a Russian BMP-2 IFV. The photograph started making the rounds of social media in the first week of May 2025. The defense consists of multiple lengths of heavy cables which have been unwound and the stranded steel wires that make up the cable splayed out into a cone-shaped arrangement. That the cable is heavy is because the steel wires are not bending and remain in the shape they were put into.

     It can be assumed that the intent of using such an odd method is to make it very difficult for a FPV drone operator to successfully fly his or her drone into the BMP-2 without the drone's propellers striking one or more of the wires and either becoming fouled in the wires or the propeller blades being damaged or broken. It is also possible that the wires may catch on a piece of the drone body such as on the zip-ties that are usually used to secure RPG warheads to the drone (as an example). One can imagine entering or exiting the BMP-2 is a tricky affair and that the wiring could be bent back if the vehicle runs through obstacles or closer confines such as urban terrain or wooded areas. In addition to the multiple wire bristle bunches, the BMP-2 also has the far more common anti-drone cage atop the turret. It is quite high and utilizes weighted chains on the sides rather than metal screens or chain link fencing.

     As for the exact make of the BMP-2, it looks to be a BMP-2M “Berezhok”. The name refers to the B05YA01 Berezhok (meaning “Shore”) combat module that replaces the standard BMP-2 turret. The new turret retains the 2A42 30mm autocannon and co-axial PKT 7.62mm machine-gun of the original BMP-2 but adds a AG-30M (or AGS-17) 30mm automatic grenade launcher (with 300 rounds) and two launch rails on each side of the turret for the 9M133M Kornet-M (NATO reporting name AT-14 Spriggan) anti-tank guided missile (ATGM). The BMP-2M “Berezhok” does not carry any reloads for the missiles and so only the four fitted to their launch rails are available. The standard 9M133 missile, which uses SACLOS (Semi-Automatic Command to Line Of Sight) laser beam riding guidance, can attain a maximum range of 3.4 miles can penetrate over 1,000mm of rolled homogeneous armor after explosive reactive armor (ERA) due to its tandem charge HEAT (High-Explosive Anti-Tank) warhead.

     Other upgrades to the BMP-2M “Berezhok” include six 81mm Type 902V Tucha smoke grenade launchers, a R-168 aqueduct intercom system for the crew, PL-1 laser illuminator, BPK-3-42 gunner's sight, 1PZ-13 commander's sight, laser range finder, and a ballistic computer tied into a “Redut” fire control system (FCS). The FCS can maintain tracking on multiple targets and can continually update firing solutions for all of the turret's weapons. Some vehicles may be equipped with the more powerful UTD-23 engine but this is more to compensate for the added 2 tons of weight due to the turret and armor (see below) as performance is the same as the regular BMP-2.

     For armor, the BMP-2M “Berezhok” has the same level of protection as the standard BMP-2 hull but some vehicles, like this one, utilize the 675-sb3KDZ add-on armor kit. This adds slat armor panels to the vehicle sides, front (missing here), turret circumference, and rear. In addition, the hull sides and the lower glacis of the front hull are fitted with polymer NERA (Non-Explosive Reactive Armor) blocks. These NERA blocks (in addition to the steel mounting plates the blocks are connected to) allow the BMP-2M “Berezhok” to withstand impacts from 12.7mm heavy machine-gun ammunition and some smaller anti-tank grenades.

For more information on the base BMP-2, visit:

https://photosofmilitaryhistory.blogspot.com/2025/01/russo-ukrainian-war-bmp-2-141st.html

Russo-Ukrainian War: The Praktika Kozak-5

Source: Reddit

     Photographed sometime in April 2025, a Kozak-5 infantry mobility vehicle (IMV) sports an extensive arrangement of anti-drone screens around the vehicle and what appears to be an anti-mine apparatus fitted to the front. The Kozak-5 (“Kozak” meaning “Cossack”) is a development of Ukrainian company Praktika's Kozak-1 which first appeared in 2009.

     The Kozak-5 is built using a variant of the chassis for the Ford F550 truck. While the Kozak-5 can be obtained with a stock chassis, it can be upgraded with a strengthened front axle housing, heavier shock absorbers and coil springs, and bigger wheels to support heavy-duty tires. A further upgrade involves replacing the regular axles with Meritor built axles which boost payload capacity by 2 tons on the front axle, even heavier springs and shock absorbers, Meritor quadratic brakes, CTIS (Central Tire Inflation System), and mil-spec wheels.

     For an engine, a Power Stroke 6.7 liter V8 diesel motor is installed with a 330 horsepower output. This is paired to a Torq Shift 10-R-140 automatic transmission with a 11-speed gearbox (10 forward, 1 reverse). On  the road, the Kozak-5 has a maximum speed of 93 miles per hour and with the onboard fuel capacity, the operational range is 497 miles.

     As an IMV, the Kozak-5 supports STANAG 4569 Level 2 armor protection as standard, using a steel alloy blend which has both a high hardness but also some plasticity. As such, the all-around defense can defeat Russian BZ 7.62x39mm API (Armor-Piercing Incendiary) ammunition at 30 meters. It also protects against 155mm HE (High-Explosive) shell fragments at 80 meters. The bullet-proof glass, made by Praktika, uses a sandwich of glass panes connected by polymer film layers. Against blasts from mines and IEDs, the Kozak-5 comes standard with STANAG 4569 Level 2a and 2b defense. Thus, it can withstand running over a 13 pound explosive charge within a pressure activated mine (Level 2a) and can also protect against a mine detonation underneath the center of the vehicle, again with a 13 pound explosive charge (Level 2b). Additional protection comes from an automatic fire extinguishing system, one for the engine and the other for the crew compartment.

     The Kozak-5 can be fitted out with three styles of turret. The first is the “basic turret” and that is shown in the photograph here. It consists of a front gun shield with two vision blocks, side shields with vision blocks, and a rear shield. Rear view mirrors are provided on the turret sides. The “simplistic design” is much as the first but without the front gun shield. Finally, there is the “closed design” which is a fully enclosed turret with bullet-proof glass vision panes and a roof hatch. The gun mount for all three turrets is designed for medium machine-guns like the 7.62mm PK. The turret is electrically rotated but can be manually rotated if need be. There are five gun ports (two per side and one in the rear) that permit passengers to utilize their small arms.

     Other systems include ergonomic seats (IMV model capacity is 9 men, including the two man crew), internal lighting, individual “goose-neck” lights for directed illumination, self-recovery winch, heater, and air-conditioning system (with an additional AC evaporator). Optional equipment includes video cameras, GPS navigation system, radio unit(s), black-out lighting, and a rear-view video camera for use by the driver.

     Returning to the photograph, the front screen is hinged to permit access to the hood for engine maintenance. There is a gap in the front screen arrangement to allow for a field of fire for the turret weapon (not fitted in this picture) though the overhead screen limits the area of attack by a FPV drone against the turret. The more interesting feature is the anti-mine apparatus. Each side has two thick rubberized material (likely conveyor belts) flaps, weighted at the bottom with a metal bar arrangement and chains can be seen which look to be what the strips are secured to via another metal bar. In turn, the chains are attached to the arms coming off the front of the Kozak-5. When in operation, the flaps would  drag along the ground and hopefully would catch any lever activated landmine and set it off before the Kozak-5's wheels did. It is similar to the KMT-6 mine ploughs Soviet-era tanks utilize to dig into the ground and push buried mines to the sides of the tank before the tracks hit them.

Russo-Ukrainian War: The Skybike CRDX-200

Source: Ministry of Defense of Ukraine

     The usage of motorcycles in war is nothing new. In fact, they saw widespread use starting in World War One where motorcycles were used primarily by reconnaissance units for scouting but also served a more vital role as the mainstay of communication units where dispatch riders found the motorcycle indispensable as a means to relay documents and orders between units when radio links were not available. To a lesser extent, motorcycles were used as transport for personnel and supplies. More recently, special forces around the world have adopted motorcycles as they are easily airdropped, small, and provide rapid off-road movement. The advent of viable electric motorcycles able to handle the rigors of the battlefield have added an element of stealth for special forces operators who no longer have to worry about the obvious engine noise of conventional petrol powered motorcycles.

     However, what was quickly learned was that motorcycles have little place in assaults. It was tried in World War One and the outcome was a disaster and the concept quickly abandoned, never to return. That was until the Russo-Ukrainian War, which started in late February 2022. The Russian Federation, in response to high losses of armored vehicles and logistical vehicles, has seen units more and more fill out their ranks with ATVs, civilian cars and trucks, and motorcycles. While it would be within reason that such vehicles can work well enough behind the lines, Russian units use them on the front lines. Notably, motorcycles are used in direct assaults against Ukrainian lines. 

     The Russian logic for “assault motorcycles” on paper seems somewhat reasonable. Motorcycles are fast, permitting the infantrymen riding them to rapidly close with the enemy. Once near, they dismount and fight on foot. Second, motorcycles are not heavy enough to set off landmines designed to target far weightier armored personnel carriers. Third, motorcycles are more maneuverable in comparison to bigger and slower armored vehicles which makes the job of FPV drone operators a bit more difficult. Combine the latter with man-portable drone jammers, that job gets a little harder.

     But, the disadvantages of using motorcycles in the assault are pretty plain to see. Motorcycles are not armored nor do they offer the rider any measure of protection against bullets or artillery/rocket fragments. Secondly, the rider cannot deploy his weapon with anything close to usefulness. At least one hand needs to steer the motorcycle and being accurate while “one-handing” an AK-74 is pretty laughable. Third, the rider has to divide his attention between the enemy and the terrain, especially when “off-roading” lest he run into a shell hole or hit an obstacle. To be fair, a lot of Ukrainian terrain is relatively flat with low grass in areas where cropland is not able to be planted. Finally, Ukrainian FPV drone operators are more than capable of hitting a Russian motorcyclist at speed and drone jammers are absolutely no guarantee of safety. That is because there is no way of knowing if a particular drone running down a motorcycle is using a frequency that rider's EW (Electronic Warfare) device is capable of jamming. Needless to say, the Russian Federation is finding out what other countries learned a while ago...motorcycles in the assault does not produce worthwhile results. But that hasn't stopped the Russian Army and so losses are very high with motorcycle troops having quite a short lifespan.

     The Ukrainian Armed Forces, notably the Ukrainian Army and Ukrainian Special Forces, do utilize motorcycles. Besides being used for the age-old roles of dispatch and scouting, they are also used by logistical units to quickly run supplies to front-line troops. They are not used for assaulting Russian lines. The particular motorcycle seen here, used by a soldier (drone jammer on his back) of the 58th. Motorized Bridgade “Ivan Vyhovskyi”, is a Skybike CRDX-200. Skybike is a brand name held by the Chinese company Sky Team, Ltd. which is a manufacturer and exporter of motorcycles. The CRDX-200 has a retail cost of around $1,500USD.

     Power comes from a 1-cylinder, air-cooled, 4-stroke 197cc engine that develops 14.3 horsepower. It is paired to a mechanical, 5-speed transmission. The engine is provided with both electric start as well as the more standard mechanical kick starter. Maximum speed is 71 miles per hour. The fuel tank capacity is 1.5 gallons. The CRDX-200 uses front and rear disk brakes while for suspension, the front utilizes inverted telescopic forks while the rear is a pendulum-style monoshock absorber. Thanks to a lightweight steel tubular frame, impact-resistant plastic components, carbon alloy exhaust pipe, and light alloy front forks, the CRDX-200 weighs 220 pounds.