Captions of photographs in a book can only give so much information. Many times, the photographs simply exist to compliment the text and so a large caption isn't needed. Here, the idea of a caption is much expanded to provide a concise yet expansive history of a particular military photograph, be it of weapons, vehicles, personnel, or battles.
Tuesday, November 4, 2025
Russo-Ukrainian War: The 2S19 Msta-S 152mm SPH
Saturday, September 27, 2025
Russo-Ukrainian War: Artillerisystem 08 Archer 155mm SPH
Wednesday, September 24, 2025
Russo-Ukrainian War: "Office" of the 2S1 Gvozdika 122mm SPH
Monday, September 22, 2025
Panzerhaubitze M109G (4. Batterie, Artillerielehrbataillon 145)
Tuesday, September 9, 2025
Russo-Ukrainian War: The AHS Krab 155mm SPG
Monday, April 7, 2025
Russo-Ukrainian War: The 2S7 Pion 203mm SPG
Sunday, March 23, 2025
Russo-Ukrainian War: The Panzerhaubitze 2000 155mm SPH
Saturday, March 15, 2025
Russo-Ukrainian War: The 57mm AZP S-60
The Russo-Ukrainian War is, for anyone that follows the weapons deployed by both Ukraine and Russia, a war of old and new arms technology. Both sides utilize weapons that saw manufacture in World War Two and built in the following decade past 1945. One example is shown here, the AZP S-60 57mm anti-aircraft gun. Standing for Avtomaticheskaya Zenitnaya Pushka (Automatic Anti-Aircraft Gun), the AZP S-60 first appeared in prototype form in 1946 and was accepted for service in 1950. Originally designed as a short- and medium range anti-aircraft gun, it is woefully obsolete in that role today without modern upgrades such as fully powered gun controls, improved ammunition,k and guidance systems. Instead, both the Ukrainians and the Russians are primarily using the AZP S-60 on ad-hoc self-propelled mountings as a rapid fire, short range artillery gun.
Normally, the AZP S-60 is mounted on a four-wheel carriage with outriggers to stabilize the platform when in action. The centrally mounted turntable permits 360 degrees of traverse while the gun mount allows for 85 degrees of maximum elevation and 4 degrees of depression. The combat weight of the AZP S-60 is five tons and a full crew consists of seven men. A 7mm thick gun shield offers a measure of protection to the gun crew from light small arms calibers and shell splinters. Typical gun crew in action is four men of which three are provided with seats (commander and two gunners to operate the power assisted, manual traverse and elevation/depression controls) and a loader. The remainder of the men are typically ammunition handlers, pushing clips to the loader. Speaking of clips, the AZP S-60 is fed from four-round clips which are pushed into a horizontal loading tray on the left side of the weapon. A well trained crew can maintain a sustained rate of fire of 70 rounds per minute though the AZP S-60 is capable of 120 rounds per minute.
The series of photographs here are screen captures from two different videos showing Ukrainian AZP S-60 crews in action, both posted on social media in February and March 2025. The first two show one of the self-propelled mountings, this particular one using a KamAZ-4310 6x6 truck. This is a typical mount, simply placing the gun and turntable onto a flat deck. The gun shield's upper half is folded down to lower the profile while to the left of the image (as one looks at it), the seat for the gunner can be seen along with the dual controls that raise and lower the gun. It is this gunner who fires the AZP S-60 via a foot trigger. Wooden crates of ammunition are lashed down to the bed. On the roof the KamAZ-4310's cab are at least two drone jammers. The next image shows the gun in action. The loader and commander are holding onto the traverse controls as the gun recoils and causes the truck to rock. The seat for the gunner who would have managed the traverse and the commander's seat (in the middle) have been removed though their mounts can be seen by the feet of the commander. As the gun is being used for indirect fire, to the right of the image is a panoramic periscope sight to enable the gunner to aim the weapon. Also of note, just behind the loader is a ready rack with a full clip for him to grab and load once the weapon is empty.
The second set show a AZP S-60 crew from the 112th. Territorial Defense Brigade preparing their gun for action while on a firing range. They are firing the UOR-281U HE-T (High-Explosive Tracer) ammunition. The sequence shows one of the ammunition handlers pushing the 4-round clip into the breech while the last image shows the loader cocking the charging handle. At this point, the weapon is ready to fire. Using such ammunition, the maximum range is around 3.8 miles.
Friday, February 14, 2025
Russo-Ukrainian War: DITA 155mm SPH
Wednesday, February 12, 2025
Russo-Ukrainian War: DANA M2 152mm SPG
Saturday, July 22, 2023
Russo-Ukrainian War: The 2S19 Msta-S
I am no expert on current Russian military tactics. However, I do have access to IAG-13-U-78 “Soviet Army Operations”, dated April 1978. This is an intelligence manual created by U.S. Army Intelligence and released by the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command. Now, I hear you say, of what good is a manual nearly 44 years old? If one examines the chapter on attacking a defending enemy (Section IV, page 3-61), there are some clear parallels to the current situation in Ukraine which suggests that the tactics referenced in this publication aren't so out of date after all.
Russian forces are reported to have largely bypassed Kharkiv in order to push deeper into Ukraine. This lines up with the tactic of bypassing an enemy in a deliberate defense (of which a city can be considered such) rather than engage it. This may account for lighter forces around the city and use of artillery to keep the defenders in the city. It is doubtful that a concentrated Ukrainian force would engage the Russians in open terrain and lose the benefit of the concealment and cover a urban warzone provides them. As such, outside of aerial attack or artillery, Russian forces are a bit more secure from massed infantry assaults.
Let us move to Kyiv. It is reported that a military convoy some 40 miles long is moving towards the city. This lines up with the first action in the manual that states the first step towards an attack of an enemy in deliberate defense is the buildup of required forces. If, indeed, the convoy is slated for the assault on Kyiv, the evidence is clear. Once the forces are in the field of battle, they will be organized. If they are following the 1978 tactics, the bulk of the forces will be amassed at the planned direction of attack. Russian tactics also allow for feints or ruses to divert the enemy attention away from the main thrust. In such attacks, the Russians, according to the manual, want to have a 4-5 to 1 advantage in troops, 6-8 to 1 in artillery, and 3-5 to 1 in tanks. This is certainly achievable today and likely has not changed much.
The Russians, as they have been since World War II, are big believers in massed artillery and rocket batteries (as seen in the superiority ratio above) and prior to the commencement of the attack, Kyiv would be subjected to a heavy bombardment. In the attack, again, if following these tactics, the Russians will not spread their forces out but instead would reduce unit frontages and have a front line of no more than 4km. Follow-on units behind the main lines would be spread further apart. This allows them to maximize their firepower and focus it towards the enemy. It is possible that the incursions in the suburbs of Kyiv by Russian forces are reconnaissance to attempt to pinpoint Ukrainian positions and capability in preparation of the main attack.
The only hope for the Ukrainian defenders in Kyiv is to withstand the initial assault and bog the Russians down which would break their momentum. Why is this important? According to the manual, the tempo of the attack is to be swift with a fast rate of advance to limit losses and overrun weak positions quickly. If it becomes a brutal, house-to-house fight, it favors the defender who knows the terrain and if Russian objectives are not achieved, it may become a serious problem.
One of the self-propelled artillery assets the Russians have deployed in Ukraine is the 2S19 Msta-S (after the Msta River). This particular example was abandoned somewhere in Sumy Oblast after the convoy it was traveling with was hit. As one can see, the travel lock for the 2A65 152mm howitzer is still engaged. The gun can fire base bleed shells out to 16 miles or if using rocket assisted ammunition, out to 18 miles. Thanks to a automatic loader, the standard 2S19 can fire up to 8 rounds every minute. A total of 50 rounds of ammunition is carried in the vehicle. The turret has a full 360 degree rotation while the gun can be elevated up to 68 degrees and depressed to a maximum of 4 degrees. For defense, the 2S19 is fitted with a pintle mounted 12.7mm NSVT heavy machine-gun (not seen here) with 300 rounds of ammunition. Built on a T-80 main battle tank chassis, the V-84A 840 horsepower engine can move the 2S19 to a maximum speed of 37 miles per hour (on roads) with a power to weight ratio of 20 horsepower per ton. Speaking of weight, loaded, the 2S19 is 42 tons, is 23.5 feet long, 11.1 feet wide, and 9.10 feet tall with a crew of 5. Armor thickness is unknown but while proof against small arms fire, it would be no defense against anti-tank missiles. It is NBC (Nuclear, Biological, Chemical) protected.
The 2S19 entered service in 1989 and the Ukrainian army had 40 of them as of 2017 though how many remain in service isn't known. However, it is highly likely this abandoned one will be turned around against its former owner.
Originally posted on March 1, 2022.
Sunday, August 22, 2021
British Stuart: Ad Hoc 18-pdr Field Gun Portée
Although the M3 light tank was U.S. designed and built, it was the British who first took it into action during Operation Crusader which commenced on November 18, 1941 in northern Africa. In British service, the M3 was known as the Stuart and for Operation Crusader, 170 Stuart I light tanks were included in the order of battle for the British 8th. Army. As the battle unfolded, units equipped with the Stuart suffered significant casualties. This, despite the fact the Stuart compared very favorably against two of the most common Axis tanks, the Panzerkampfwagen III Ausf G and the Italian Fiat M13/40. Against the former, the two tanks were evenly matched in terms of speed and armor protection and both the Stuart's 37mm M6 gun and the PzKpfw III's 3.7cm KwK 36 gun could knock the other tank out from over 1,000 meters. Against the Fiat, the M3 dominated the Italian medium tank and the Stuart was invulnerable to the 47mm Cannone da 47/32 AT gun from 1,000 meters and beyond whereas the Stuart could penetrate the M13/40 almost anywhere at that range. Analysis following the Allied victory against Axis forces on December 30, 1941 showed that the high casualty rate had more to do with the skill of German tank crews and superior tactics. The British also found that the two-man turret of the Stuart was problematic, to the point that some Stuart crews tried to squeeze a third man in to facilitate gun handling. The Stuart also did not have a high fuel capacity in comparison to some British tanks (such as the Crusader) which limited its range to only 75 miles. Still, the British appreciated the mechanical reliability of the Stuart and excellent speed. Nevertheless, by mid-1942, the British relegated the Stuart to reconnaissance tasks only, avoiding tank-vs-tank combat wherever possible. The British continued to use the Stuart throughout World War Two. Subsequent models were the Stuart II (Guiberson diesel engined M3), Stuart III (M3A1), Stuart IV (Guiberson engined M3A1), Stuart V (M3A3), and the Stuart VI (M5 and M5A1).
The British also used a number of variants of the Stuart and two of the most common were the Stuart Recce and the Stuart Kangaroo. The Stuart Recce removed the turret which lowered the profile of the tank and lowered the weight of the vehicle which in turn, improved range. The Stuart Kangaroo also removed the turret and the vehicle was used as an armored personnel carrier (APC). There is debate on if the name “Kangaroo” was ever applied to the Stuart like it was to other similar vehicles derived from the M7 Priest, M4 Sherman, and Canadian Ram tank. These APCs were mostly used by British engineer units attached to armored brigades. A third, relatively common variant, was the Stuart Command which was also a turret-less Stuart but utilized by commanders and was equipped with additional radio equipment.
This, then, brings us to the subject of the photograph. It depicts a one-off modification to a Stuart in which a British Ordnance QF 18-pounder field gun, sans wheels, was fitted to a simple bracket mount in place of the tank's turret. Although many of these guns were converted into the improved QF 25-pounder gun prior to World War Two, a number of the older guns (which entered service in 1904) remained in service and saw action during the opening stages of the North African campaign. Whether this ad hoc self-propelled gun (or portée) was ever used in action remains unknown but it was certainly constructed during the North African campaign in 1941-42. An examination of the mounting suggests that the gun was centered on the upper hull with the box trail extending over the opening left by the removal of the turret. This would allow the gun to be elevated to a maximum of 37 degrees and permit recoil. Of course, this assumes the gun is the Mk. III or Mk. IV model. If, on the other hand, the gun was an older Mk. I or Mk. II with a single, central trail, then the maximum elevation was only 16 degrees. The gun crew would have operated the gun without the benefit of all-around protection with the only measure of defense coming from the gun shield. It appears that two of the three hull machine-guns (one front hull mounted and one in each side of the upper hull) were removed, likely to make room for ammunition. This left only the front hull machine-gun. If the intent was to provide mobility for the gun and its 6.3 mile range was its defense from enemy attack, then having the additional machine-guns wasn't needed and if need be, crew small arms could also be utilized for close-in defense. How much ammunition the modified Stuart could carry isn't known though with the shell being a little over 1 foot long, an adequate supply could likely have been stowed if the machine-guns and the ammunition for them was removed. How the crew entered the SPG is also not known. It may have been possible for the crew to slip underneath the trailing arm or perhaps the trailing arm was not secured to the rear deck and the gun could be tilted upward to permit the crew to enter. Certainly in action, three men would likely have been crewing the gun from the deck while another remained in the tank, passing ammunition up through the opening where the turret had been. Some have said the modified Stuart was used as an assault gun, utilizing the gun for infantry support in the direct fire role. However, this is unlikely given the high profile of the SPG, the lack of armor protection for the gun crew, and the relatively light armor of the tank itself.
Wednesday, July 21, 2021
The M-1978 Koksan: North Korea's 170mm Self-Propelled Gun
The M-1978 “Koksan” is a rather unusual self-propelled gun (SPG) in a number of aspects. Built by the Second Machine Industry Bureau of North Korea, the SPG uses the chassis of the Chinese built and supplied Type 59 main battle tank (itself a Chinese version of the Russian T-54A tank) and mates it with a 170mm gun. The gun itself is a bit of a mystery given the caliber. Some sources say it was derived from a Russian naval gun except that the Russians never used any such caliber. The closest is the 180mm M1931/M1932 pattern naval gun. Other sources say the gun is some form of copy or version of the World War 2 German 170mm Kanone 18 or at least designed to fire captured stocks of 170mm ammunition supplied by Russia (which doesn’t seem completely plausible).
However the North Korean military arrived at the 170mm, the SPG first appeared to Western eyes in a military parade in 1978 held in Koksan County, located in North Hwanghae Province. Since the actual designation for the SPG is not known, Western intelligence analysts gave it the name M-1978 Koksan after the year and place it was first seen. The Koksan was one of the first weapon systems North Korea exported and the only foreign buyer was Iran who purchased a number of them in 1987 and they saw action during the Iran-Iraq War (September 22, 1980 to August 20, 1988), shelling Kuwaiti oil fields using rocket-assisted rounds which made them immune from Iraqi counter-battery fire. During the war, Iraqi forces captured several of the M-1978 and emplaced them as war trophies.
The one in the image was located near the University of Anbar in Ramadi, Anbar, Iraq and is seen being towed away by U.S. Marines in 2008. The M-1978 remains in North Korean service and some sources say surviving Iranian M-1978s also remain in service with Iranian artillery forces.
Tuesday, July 13, 2021
The Holt 55–1: The Beginning of U.S. Self-Propelled Guns
Even as far back as 1915, the U.S. Army Ordnance Department was investigating the mechanization of field artillery beyond simply using tractors to move artillery pieces about the battlefield. During World War One, the Holt Tractor Company was the largest producer of tractors and supplied not only the U.S. Army but also the armies of Britain and France with all three nations using the tractors to pull their respective heavy artillery pieces across the battlefield where horses and trucks could not tread. It would be the British that beat the U.S. to the punch with the development of the Gun Carrier Mk. I, the world’s first production self-propelled gun. Using components from the original British Mk. I tank, the fully tracked Gun Carrier Mk. I was designed to carry either the Ordnance BL 6in. howitzer or the Ordnance BL 60-pounder gun. The vehicle was meant to move the guns to firing positions where they would be dismounted and set up but if need be, the 6in. Gun (not the 60-pounder) could be fired while still on the Gun Carrier. Deliveries of the Gun Carrier Mk. I started in mid-1917 and in all, some 48 vehicles were delivered by the end of the war. As it was, in practice, the Gun Carrier Mk. I was used more as a supply vehicle and rarely as a self-propelled gun. Two major occasions where the Gun Carrier Mk. I functioned as a self-propelled gun was during the Battle of Pilckem Ridge (that ran from July 31, 1917 to August 2, 1917) and the Battle of Amiens (from August 8 through August 12, 1918) and in both cases, the crews fired the howitzers then shifted positions in order to avoid any German counter-battery fire. This is a tactic used even today by self-propelled artillery.
Returning to the U.S., the Ordnance Department was looking to mount the new 3in. M1917 anti-aircraft gun on a tractor and the Holt Tractor Company stepped up to the plate and suggested a proposal by Pliny E. Holt for just such a mount. Authorization was received to commence development and construction of a prototype and sometime in 1917, the all caterpillar tracked Holt 55–1 was completed and submitted for testing. The Holt 55–1 was a relatively simple affair, consisting of a rectangular riveted metal chassis with the engine, fuel tank, and driver’s station in the rear and the M1917 gun fitted to a high-elevation pedestal mount in the center of the chassis. There was no armor or shielding to protect the power-train, crew or gun though the 55–1 did have outriggers that were deployed to stabilize the vehicle during firing. Testing showed that the 55–1 did have some problems but nevertheless, it demonstrated that the concept of a self-propelled artillery gun was worthwhile. The 55–1 was refitted to carry the heavy Vickers built BL 8in. Mk. VIII howitzer and that is what is shown in this picture distributed by the news photography division of Underwood & Underwood. The mount for the howitzer was made of thick oak planking and does not appear to have had any elevation capability. However, as it was simply a test mount, the Holt 55–1 performed adequately, being able to absorb the recoil of the howitzer without any difficulty. Like the previous gun mount, the revised Holt 55–1 had two extendable outriggers on each side though in this retouched photograph, they appear to be missing. Very few actual photographs exist of the 55–1 and those that do don’t show any camouflage paint applied. In addition to the two gun mounted variants, the 55–1 was also tested as a unarmed (and unarmored) transport, the driver’s station having been moved to the front of the vehicle. The Holt engine along with it’s radiator can be seen with the driver sitting in front of it. On the other side of the driver is the fuel tank for the engine. It appears that there is another man with steering levers on the front of the 55–1 but he is likely just holding on to the outrigger components as there was no room for a driver station in front with the gun mounting. Thus, the driver worked both the speed control as well as the steering levers for the vehicle. The driver actually had no seat and instead, he is sitting on the oak planking that went around the top of the vehicle. Likewise, the three standing men are also atop the oak planks, one of them holding on to a metal brace supporting the gun. It is unknown what the crank is for as an original photograph of the 55–1 doesn’t show such an apparatus so it may have been added to the photograph.
The 55–1 weighed 11 tons, was 20.6 feet long, 10 feet wide, and 9.5 feet high. Power came from a single Holt 4-cylinder engine that developed 75 horsepower. The engine was tied into a Clark 5-speed transmission. This gave the 55–1 a maximum speed of 5mph. The 8in. Mk. VIII howitzer fired a 200 pound high-explosive shell at a muzzle velocity of 1,500 feet per second. This gave the gun an effective range of just shy of 7 miles. The normal elevation of the gun was 0 degrees to a maximum of 45 degrees and a traverse of 4 degrees to the left or right. The breech was of the Welin interrupted screw type with a Asbury Breech Mechanism that opened the breech by combining the unscrewing, withdrawing, and swinging clear movements of the breech into one continuous action. Likewise, the closing of the breech after the round and charge was loaded was also one action. This sped up the loading and unloading of heavy guns which allowed for a increase in the rate of fire. Recoil was absorbed by a hydro-pneumatic recuperator and hydraulic buffer.
Only one Holt 55–1 was constructed and it was not put into production. Pliny Holt was lured away from the Holt Tractor Company and went to work for the Rock Island Arsenal, Rock Island, Illinois and while there, he oversaw the development of a series of self-propelled guns, the Mark I through the Mark X between 1918 and 1922. Fifty Mark I (with the 8in. Mk.VIII howitzer), fifty Mark II (with a 155mm M1918 gun), and a total of 250 Mark III and Mark IV (with a 240mm Schneider TR M1914 howitzer) self-propelled guns were contracted but the end of World War One saw the contract drastically cut back to only a handful of vehicles for experimentation use only. Despite none of Holt’s vehicles making it into production service with the U.S. Army, they did provide significant knowledge in design that would come into play when war once again loomed on the horizon.









.png)







